|
Post by eclipse on Dec 12, 2009 16:34:58 GMT -5
I believe what Wayne's talking about is that the templates look dark and rough, because of the shading style. Could say it looks "muddy" but, I actually don't mind that style, so there's nothing wrong in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by waynev1 on Dec 12, 2009 17:44:07 GMT -5
Yeah, that's what I'm trying to hit at basically but to be fair, they still look great maybe I'll just have to get used to this one.
|
|
|
Post by Hurricane on Dec 12, 2009 18:46:47 GMT -5
Don't see the 'muddyness', but roughness is what I'm going for. I usually use styles with heaps of shades that are closer together and more realistic, but now I'm trying to use one that's a bit more cartoony and has more of an impact.
|
|
|
Post by AC on Dec 13, 2009 0:30:23 GMT -5
I'm really liking all of them but I'm not feeling the template. The body's look dirty to me, oh well maybe it will grow on me. These are some excellent work.
|
|
|
Post by Hurricane on Dec 13, 2009 0:57:17 GMT -5
Third person to say it looks dirty, so it's obviously something.... but I just really, honestly can't see anything wrong with it... who knows.
|
|
|
Post by eclipse on Dec 13, 2009 2:56:21 GMT -5
There's nothing actually wrong with it at all, like they've said, the micros look good. Just because one shading style is different doesn't mean it's bad. I mean, look at Drake for example. He uses some serious dark tones on his micros, they create a chocolate melty color, but they still look good.
|
|
|
Post by waynev1 on Dec 13, 2009 5:13:57 GMT -5
Yeah there is nothing wrong with it, i guess people will just have to get used to it since they are your micros and your own style.
|
|